Mass Consumption Isn’t Just All-American—The Nazis Had It, Too

" ... When we buy Sanka coffee, Knorr soups, Nivea creams, or Hugo Boss menswear, we are buying goods whose stories are intertwined with Germany’s tortured past. ... "

By S. Jonathan Wiesen
History News Network | January 24, 2011

S. Jonathan Wiesen is associate professor of history at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. He is the author of Creating the Nazi Marketplace: Commerce and Consumption in the Third Reich (Cambridge University Press; February 2011).

... Given the prominence of shopping in our national conversation, one might assume that the obsessive relationship to consumption is uniquely American.  This is not the case.  For well over a century, policymakers throughout the world have tried to figure out how “getting and spending” were linked to their country’s well-being.  A striking setting for this preoccupation was Nazi Germany.  When we consider a society bathed in propaganda and violence, the rather mundane act of shopping does not immediately come to mind.  Yet the Nazis made it clear that they didn’t only want to build an “Aryan” nation and to colonize Europe.  They wanted to build a rich country, indeed one marked by better consumer opportunities and a higher standard of living than even the United States.

Of course, it doesn’t come as a total surprise that the Nazis thought a lot about consumers.  After all, the Volkswagen began as Hitler’s pet project to supply affordable mass transportation to the population (provided one was not a Jew, a Roma, a homosexual, or in any other way racially, mentally, or physically “compromised”).  And the Nazis built much of their success on the recovery of the economy after the Great Depression.  But most people don’t realize that hundreds of everyday products—many of which we still purchase today—occupied an important role in Nazi society and ideology.  When we buy laundry detergents or over-the-counter drugs—like Persil soap or Bayer aspirin—we are buying the merchandise of German companies that, in the 1930s and 1940s, marketed their goods throughout the Third Reich.  Effective detergents and pharmaceuticals were supposed to maintain the health and purity of the German “Volk.”  When we buy Sanka coffee, Knorr soups, Nivea creams, or Hugo Boss menswear, we are buying goods whose stories are intertwined with Germany’s tortured past.

Of course each of these products and their manufacturers have their unique histories.  But what they share is a common link to visions of Germany as a thriving modern consumer culture.  If we look, in particular, at the Nazi years, we can see how marketers went about selling such goods at a time when the state was gearing up for a racial war.  We might think that advertising in such a setting was the same thing as propaganda—violent, coercive, and filled with anti-Semitic imagery.  But in many respects, the work of marketing experts resembled that of their colleagues in other countries, like the U.S., that were not racist dictatorships.  And the companies that sold these goods felt a certain measure of business-as-usual during this time.  At the same time, the Nazis saw marketing and advertising as something special—as a means of building public support for their brutal aims through promises of “the good life.”

What did the commercial landscape look like in Nazi Germany?  Aside from the omnipresence of newspaper and magazine ads, companies showed commercials and mini-documentaries about their merchandise before a feature film.  Celebrities like boxer Max Schmeling did product plugs for decaf coffee, while consumer researchers went from house to house asking people about their favorite hair tonics, handbags, and hosiery.  And well-attended trade fairs and exhibition pavilions were filled with the stuff of everyday modern life:  plastic goods, refrigerators, cars, toys, and clothes.

The Nazis did not tolerate all forms of commerce.  Billboards were limited, radio ads were banned, and as Germany went on a war footing, quality products became increasingly rare and marketing regulations became stricter.  But the general semblance of normality in the prewar marketplace—and the promise of future abundance during the war—did allow people to throw their lot behind the Nazis and, in an indirect way, enable their crimes.  And when well-known companies aided Nazi criminality—through the use of forced concentration camp labor—they did so not per se in the name of racial engineering, but in the name of selling cars, clothing, and aspirin.  In the end, mass consumption remained a key component of the Nazi vision until the end of World War II, when the dream of a well-provisioned Aryan super-race collapsed in the rubble of Germany’s towns and cities.

http://www.hnn.us/articles/135681.html

  • Lyle Courtsal

    Speaking of nazis stealing tech, I was almost attacked by a right wing cop one day at the frisbee park in north seattle who wanted to run my freaky ass off and couldn’t handle the truth about that frisbee he was throwing being developed by hippies like me. Another delusional a-hole attacking the “volk”. Wait, I ain’t a nazi.

  • Steven

    Nice job, but there’s one minor quibble: despite what the world’s neo-Nazis might like to boast, Hitler didn’t invent the Beetle. Ferdi Porsche did{there is some evidence a Jewish friend and co-worker of his may have played a major role}…….whom, btw, had to leave Germany roughly around the time WWII started.

    In fact, if anything, the Nazis hijacked the project……they did that with a lotta things it seems, just like our own gov’t……..any similarities now ya think? Hmm……..=p

    Anyway, thanks for posting this.