Also see: "FLASHBACK: 'Michael Jackson Guilty As Sin, Free as a Bird'" and "Michael Jackson and the Fellowship Foundation Cult." Also: "Aphrodite Jones's 'The Michael Jackson Conspiracy' is a Whitewash," and "Professional Pedophile Apologist Mary Fischer Cited in Defense of Michael Jackson"
"The cover-up proves the crime ... "
By Alex Constantine
The damage to Jackson's image was pedophilia.
The many excuses we've heard over the years - that Jackson paid out $20-million in a gold-digging shakedown, that he enjoyed sleeping with children (after "Jesus Juice") to evoke a childhood that he never experienced - are "damage control," plausible tales of deniablility spun by professional media manipulators.
Jackson was a pedophile.
Media-addicted (to escape hard, everyday reality in a parafascist state), celebrity-worshipping (same explanation) fans who care more about MTV glitter than the welfare of children cite cooked arguments and cling to an inflated bias in his defense.
Dezenhall Resources, the PR firm I mentioned, largely represents political and corporate "insiders" who face legal problems brought on by violations of law. The same is true in Jackson's case.
Jackson's defenders are misinformed, blinded by glitz and lies. Those who read anything at all beyond the gossip columns will cite an article that appeared in GQ magazine in October, 1994, by Mary A. Fischer. The article was titled, "The Framing of Michael Jackson." It is chock-a-block with misrepresentations that would be considered perjury in a courtroom. But GQ magazine was not a courtroom (not even a very credible publication), and in print Ms. Fischer could allege practically anything.
She could claim, for instance, that the said $20-million bribe was not really a bribe at all, that it was much less than the plaintiff asked for - and so has negligible significance as evidence of guilt. But most settlements are a compromise, after all, and there goes the argument. This sort of twisted reasoning, "spin," is what PR firms do, and I think it's very possible that Ms. Fischer and Jackson's powerful, well-connected public relations team devised this argument to discard the appearance of wrongdoing in that $20-million BRIBE.
Fact is, I knew all about Ms. Fischer when the article was published. I was in a unique position to uderstand what she was up to in that article - she is a professional liar who will write an article defending the guilty for a major publication for pay. I'd known this for some time. By 1994, I'd had long, painful experience as a journalist turning back her published disinformation - in the "mainstream" press - on ritual child abuse.
Ms. Fischer is a professional journalistic painted lady - like the drug company ghost writers who pen articles claiming that a medication with serious side effects is really safe. She's one of those. But Mary Fischer doesn't write deceptive articles for drug companies, though - she prefers child molesters.
There is a school of pedophile advocates in the media. They began 20 years ago with profitable ties to the Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), though that connection is currently obscured and they operate as moles in the press. They often cry "child abuse witch-hunt" at the drop of a hat. In the public print, they libel anyone who writes intelligently about ritual abuse/mind control.
They are vermin.
In the past, she had written articles discrediting the McMartin Preschool sex abuse allegations. I also covered the case in detail and knew, as no else did, that she was lying. Again, her facts and reasoning were deliberately skewed, following a script written by members of the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF - whose first chairman, Dr. Ralph Underwager, had formerly been a NAMBLA official, and the media tactics are familiar becaue he was a media darling for pedophile apologias widely quoted by leading newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times and London's Times), a CIA/pedophile front that concocts bogus psychological and legal arguments to discredit victims of mind control, RA and organized pedophilia.
She was hired by a propagandist named Abby Mann to make liars of children who'd been drugged, molested, video-taped for the lucrative child porn market, and tortured in a pre-school setting. The childrens' allegations were true but made to look ridiculous in the media. The press lied and spun the case to discredit them.
Mary Fischer was one of a small circle of "journalists," all connected by the FMSF, who wrote articles claiming that the McMartin children had "false memories." Newspapers would not print evidentiary articles supporting the children. Only one side was actually presented - defending the teachers who'd been "falsely accused" - and supporters of the children were blacklisted. All of this took place very quietly, behind the scenes, and only the parents and children of McMartin understand what happened. The public doesn't comprehend what really went on at the school because the disinformation spun by Ms. Fischer and another media liar who "reported" on the McMartin case, Debbie Nathan (who went on to work for NAMBLA's Dr. Underwager), among others, was widely disseminated. They convinced the public that ritual abuse, a cover for mind control operations, was a figment of young fertile imaginations and therapist coercion - a "witch hunt."
Ms. Fischer is a cover-up artist. She might be described as a PR hack for rich pedophiles.
Her arguments are specious when you examine them closely and do a little fact-checking, but the average reader of GQ in 1994 didn't understand her history, and swallowed the lies intended to clear Michael Jackson in public opinion of crimes he really did commit.
The cover-up proves the crime, as they say - in a sense, Mary Fischer has done us all a favor. Her article proposing that Jackson was "framed," coming from a hired-pen with a history of lying about child abuse, is hard evidence of his guilt.
In the past I've had reservations about the allegations. Now I have no problem stating without a doubt that Jackson sexually handled children. A paid cover-up artist ran to his defense, pulling out arguments that reek of PR tactics, and her toxic moonshine was splashed across magazine stands across the country.
That was the final straw, IMhO. Jackson, as his own sister maintained on national television, was guilty of child molestation. Having been reminded by a reader of this blog of Fischer's article, I now harbor no doubts.
And there is another factor that complicates everything. Roseanne Barr maintains that Jackson told her of his Dissociative Identity Disorder - multiple personalities. It is possible that one of his alter personalities molests children. This is the door to another facet of the case, an unexamined one that could explain everything. But that door leads to a room full of implications that need to be explored at length - and I'm eagerly looking forward to the day someone in the media explores that room.