Loading...
post-template-default single single-post postid-4705 single-format-standard

Cocaine, Death Squads and the War on Terror (Book Review)

Alex Constantine - August 5, 2012

qe4r 300x200 - Cocaine, Death Squads and the War on Terror (Book Review)" ... The book’s argument that '[t]he war on drugs and terror in Colombia is in fact a war for the control of the cocaine trade—in a system of imperial domination—by means of state-sponsored terror' is summarized in the conclusion as follows: 'This war as decreed by successive Washington administrations was, is, and remains its opposites: a war for drugs and a war of terror.' ... ”

By BELÉN FERNÁNDEZ (Excerpt)

Monthly Review Press, MAY 30, 2012

... In an important new book entitled Cocaine, death squads, and the war on terror: U.S. imperialism and class struggle in Colombia, scholars Oliver Villar and Drew Cottle expose the sinister motivations behind—and manifestations of—the “U.S. war on drugs and terror” in Colombia.

Refuting USAID’s seemingly charitable concern for the cultivation of morally upstanding crops, the authors provide a succinct but detailed history of the United States’ alliances with drug traffickers and paramilitaries and its contributions to Colombian state repression and the institutionalization of the cocaine industry. Notable beneficiaries of the malevolent nexus have included Lockheed Martin and DynCorp, a private mercenary firm which Villar and Cottle note “is the same private company that the Reagan-Bush administration used to run arms and drugs during the cocaine decade [of the 1980s].”

Projecting narco-terror

cocaine death squads war on terror 125x191 - Cocaine, Death Squads and the War on Terror (Book Review)The book’s argument that “[t]he war on drugs and terror in Colombia is in fact a war for the control of the cocaine trade—in a system of imperial domination—by means of state-sponsored terror” is summarized in the conclusion as follows: “This war as decreed by successive Washington administrations was, is, and remains its opposites: a war for drugs and a war of terror.”

Of course, such assessments are not easily grafted onto the consciousness of a populace conditioned to impute noble—or at least sincere and non-paradoxical—motives to U.S. projects abroad. If the U.S. is to attain the minimum amount of self-awareness necessary for any society that considers itself free, the proliferation of studies like Villar and Cottle’s is a prerequisite.

The scholars explain that, starting in the late 1980s, “the Colombian state commenced efforts to manufacture its image as a defender of democracy at war with narco-terrorists,” enlisting the talents of U.S. public relations firm the Sawyer/Miller Group. The firm earned nearly a million dollars in the first six months of 1991 for its efforts, which included “us[ing] the American press to disseminate Colombian government propaganda, with the routine production of pamphlets, letters to editors signed by Colombian officials, and advertisements placed in the New York Times and Washington Post.”

As tends to happen with even the most diligently manufactured threats, however, the traitorous truth has consistently failed to rise to the occasion, and “in 2001 Colombian intelligence estimated that [the] FARC controlled less than 2.5 percent of Colombia’s cocaine exports, while the AUC controlled 40 percent, not counting the narco-bourgeoisie [the updated incarnation of the Colombian oligarchy] as a whole.”

The exclusive assignment of the “terrorist” label to the FARC is meanwhile not entirely congruent with the fact that it was the Colombian military and not the guerrillas that resuscitated the Vietnam-era collective punishment method of “draining the sea to kill the fish.” According to Villar and Cottle, “[h]uman rights groups contend that the AUC and Colombian armed forces have been responsible for approximately 90 to 95 percent of all politically-motivated killings, which have included massacres by chainsaw and other methods designed to terrorize the campesinos in rural areas under FARC control.”

As for the U.S. request in the 1980s for the extradition of Medellín cartel kingpin Pablo Escobar for “conspiring to introduce cocaine into the United States via Nicaragua,” this allegation might have just as aptly been levied against other characters such as U.S. Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North, whose activity did not result in a collaborative assassination effort by the CIA, AUC, Cali Cartel, and Colombian police….

http://monthlyreview.org/press/news/cocaine-death-squads-reviewed-in-jacobin/

No comments yet.

  1. Greed kills, and yeah, I believe it too; gawd. Those a-holes were gone, gone, gone off the hook under Fujimori and Montesinos for how many administrations? Remember Lori Berenson? She must’ve stumbled onto something for them to go to the lengths they did to set her up for 20 years in jail on false terrorism charges. The false charges I was set up on in Seattle were designed to make me look like a crazy violent lefty anarchist, and to fulfill the “lone nut” stereotype that is used so often to go after those durned dissidents in the US. Also see Florence Cassez set up as a drug trafficker for being an unembedded journalist in mexico. Oh, those durned women again; voting, the idea, the horror.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *